Ok, time to be controversial: I think that having a pattern where you only lead or only follow is cause for concern. It's more prevalent in people with sexist ideas, but also can exist in people who basically take their ideas about role-reversal too far.
If you were just a s petulant a child as you are a grumpus here, then you earned it.
Who is doing that?
Only if you completely detach yourself from the situation. You have a birds view or even more you see your person as a character in a video game and the goal as to save as many as possible.
You haven't defined "faith."
The historians aren't reliable sources of information. Can you verify it any other way?
Perhaps only the phallus worshippers.
My own picture right there is an argument as to why Protestants have no authority over the Catholic Bible.
" God expected the human mind to have imagination & explore."... And that would Include to explore that Notions that "IT" doesn't exist and that "IT" is purely a Figment of Human Imagination..
Duel function lingerie/sportswear...
Interpretation can vary based upon what one takes ambiguous terms like "false prophets," "fine fruit," "righteousness," etc. to mean. They have meant and can mean very different things within different traditions and worldviews. Meanings also tend to change with somewhat time (as indicated by Tokyo's comment).
I mean yeah, go after the big time dealers, but all the users need to be treated as patients instead of inmates.
Thank you Joshua
I am the Lorax. I speak for the trees.
AB 2943 infringes on nobody's religious freedom. If Bill and Jim want to play a game in which Bill is the "doctor" and Jim is the "patient," and Bill "cures" Jim of homosexuality, they are completely free to play it in the state of California. They just can't pretend it's science, or charge money for it, or force others to play it, and Jim is allowed to sue Bill once he realizes what a fraud Bill is. If Jim is as happy as all the former "patients" you claim, that won't be an issue.