Twitter and Google were outed already for not hiring conservatives. When conservatives complained I shrugged. You don't have a right to work at Google.
"I did not break the vase"
I did, but this OP and my original point was not about what book I liked or what motivated Hitch to write god is not great. It's about New Atheists and history. Your worst examples Hitch's alleged bad history claims were one literally untrue claim that could have been meant metaphorically and one out of context point. That isn't persuasive.
We usually don't notice until someone tries to add a couple new skulls, something about pre-existing non-conforming structures making it ok now.
Yup, and could have put in something better like "thou shalt not own another human as property"
I don't really go for the dubious "trust everything I say or do without question because I'm perfect" bit.
You shouldn't falsely accuse those you seek information from, of breaking the law.
I don't know what it would be charged as, as there have been new laws on hate speech, or not exactly, more incitation to terrorism. I'm not even sure.
I just want to send you my best wishes during this hard time and hope it all get's sorted asap.
it's bad. i go to the NY metropolitan museum to see their Byzantine coin collection... yikes
Bertrand Russell said of George Santayana, "He believes, "There is no God, and Mary is His Mother" ".
Implication...thanks for buzzing by.
I don't understand your comment. Where did I say the EU? My point is that the United States has been protecting Europe financially and militarily since World War II at the expense of American tax dollars.
It works like this, Paddleman...
Dictators aren't known for being nice people, no matter their religious belief.
Aren't you worried that dictatorships always result in uprisings?
The full truth is in the Bible, the churches could preach it,
AND I think the "and you're gonna be there" part is hilarious. Wonder what else she's going to insist he does with this dude....
I mean if someone picks you up in bar for sex and you expect a ring...I have some ocean property in the sahara you might be into
I believe there is always going to be a tug of war between moderate and fundie Christians. That has always been and will always be the case.
Ah, but that's just it. We would all (or most) be more than happy to accomodate someone for whom it means so much. That is only humane. In fact if I saw a trans person in distress about not being called a woman (or man) I'd be the first to do so. But it would be
Narrow ruling that only affects cases that be shown to have been decided with religious bias. Won't have anything directly to do with Arlene's Flowers:
When you attempt to disprove evolution, perhaps you should find articles which do anything but expound upon evolution and add depth to its understanding.
He?s not going to spam over there either. Just the discussions he posts. So when the present discussions close. He can?t post one
That is your opinion
I sure you have a perfectly reasonable
The adequacy of the explanation is a separate question from whether an unfalsifiable claim can explain. You can argue that the explanation doesn't take into account all the data, or doesn't make sense, but that is a separate issue.
Then Doug's wife should sue him.
First, LeBron needs to worry about being swept. No ring for the king!