Obviously the teachings associated with the Christ figure did not write themselves, and we know that they were floating around as an oral tradition before they were written down within 100 years of his alleged historical appearance. The person who wrote the "Word", who came up with that, creatively, most certainly existed.
And she'll be both good and bad depending upon your need to make a point - a man without standards.
They did - it's called the GOP.
Only the most high-end yoga pants I can find. My skin doesn't touch anything that cost less than $1,000.
I see - you're the more smarterer christian, and not an atheist?
I take it you have a better system, instead of the majority deciding issues.
All correct except for the God parts.
Scripture is available to everyone.
IF they want to, THEY have the freedom to. Let them chose personally.
"First, I'm not sure what you think that would prove."
Then reformulate your statement avoiding it.
Uh, yeah. You?re not quite demonstrating adequate understanding in that kind of question. None of the Physical and Life Sciences explain what the Social Sciences study. The Social Sciences make amply clear that human beings need Psychosocial mental health, which would have helped Newton address his repeated episodes of nervous breakdowns, Huygens? his chronic depression, and Einstein his emotional abandonment of his second wife as she was dying. Therapeutic Psychology began with Freud?s unspiritual and anti-religious perspective, which he revised later. His ex-student generation immediately had spiritual orientations being developed, as in Jung, Adler, and Assagioli.
Gillette's confirmed that no amount of bloodshed and murder will dissuade them from believing in an unfettered right to fire arms... so it's easier to think of it as a human sacrifice cult.
But a blue print is a thing
Even as a Christian, I think Lee Strobel's work is rather weak. He heavily leans on only Christians throughout his book as his source of information: there's hardly any other view allowed and even then, it's filtered and explained away from a solely Christian platform.
He claimed I was talking "archaeology" because he could not counter male and female gods have sex and children. Or you know, pantheons.
Here we go again. Someone who disagrees with you has a 'stupid' perspective.
Maybe after you're done smearing autistic people you can explain how it is that your personal, private definitions of "deism" and "omnipotence" and "empirical knowledge" should be the operating definitions in our "conversation". Because if you don't, you're simply arguing that your emotional attachment to the way you use words is extraordinarily important to you. Which is interesting, from a psychological perspective about why humans hold irrational beliefs, but it doesn't tell me much else about whether there is evidence for God. And as has been said before, the fallacy of equivocation is one children literally use in kindergarten, and has no place in serious conversations.
There is no straw man if its reality.
Right you are - my apologies
1. Who? What were/are the "rational defences" you refer to?
lmao, whatever. Clearly, you are pro stupid
So you don't like me saying 'pro abortion' but you^re ok with calling a foetus in a 'parasitic relationship.'
He mis-dialed....added an "i".....that's happening next door. You have to love those Italians :)))
That's the problem with KJV. It may be clear itself, but is it accurate?
Were they harassing you or anyone else, or just causing a ruckus and being loud? As long as they weren't specifically trying to annoy people I think you just have to suck it up.
Anything which infringes on our Rights requires a high level of scrutiny. In the case of the Colorado baker, yes, it was hurt feelings.
What is the purpose of mentioning the Muslim view in this post? Islam came along centuries later, and Mohammed knew about the Christian faith.
John McCain: "The President has inexplicably shown our adversaries the deference and esteem that should be reserved for our closest allies. Those nations ... are being treated with contempt. This is ... a sure path to diminishing America's leadership in the world."