Please do criticize. I would like to know what I got wrong.
Are you asking why Genesis' account doesn't make sense?
I don't have a waffle iron - can I make it up to you in...other... ways?
Like I said to Kenny: not if you recant your blasphemy (I notice you're just mean about God, not attacking the rationale of belief).
> See the OP for the arguments supporting that premise.
And now Smiley is falsely claiming I am bashing the resolution channel. Very odd....
yes, if you read the research - however when constrained by scientific limitations it is inconclusive. Which simply means a person will believe what their own experience dictates.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'substance'.
yes - it's really really icky
I liked school in terms of liking to learn. And even when I didn't, I could at least recognize that education was important.
Its called reading genius.
Nope, he's after his few minutes of fame. He wasn't even there.
Learn how to make an argument. You don't have any, just denialism. The article is detailed on the evidence.
you can do a quick google image search of 19th century political cartoons regarding the italian and irish immigrants to see many, many depictions of the newcomers as terrorists from a foreign and dangerous religion. no joke
Spoken from a platform of true ignorance and faith in an intellect being carried around in a mud sack. I get it. I spoke from the same platform for a long time. Consider. This dating system in which you have so much faith is founded on the quicksand of human understanding. There is no written history further back than 3500 B.C. or so. All else is speculation based on the accumulated knowledge of our time. And you say we are fools. You have faith. Just not in the right things.
I honestly don't think even Darwin would be a Darwinist if he knew then what we know now.
which was written how many years after the crucifixion?
I think this would be relevant if it were like... 1999 or 2000. But in this day and age, it's pretty normal to make and meet online friends irl. Maybe see if he could drop her off and she could briefly introduce them to him before he made his exit.
The spiritual I'm talking about is things pertaining to God
There are antique texts that we're aware of only through fragments. The poems of Sapphos for instance. (And... some ancient new testament fragments)
I would have thought it was our hearing that was aces. Plus, we remember everything.
hmm...maybe that's the answer. There were many arks....that would help explain things
YOU presume too damn much. And again, I see you got no problem with extremist Christian views and those who put those views into practice now do you?
I know people think I'm crazy, but that's fine. But I'm surprised they don't get the issue at hand, and that being that these tricks are either a great big set up with everyone on and off camera in on the act, or it's supernatural, because there is simply no other way for some of these 'tricks'
That's the narrow view. The AAP says one thing, other people say another.
i truly would like a liberal to surprise me. the closest is those 2 starbucks dudes settling for $1 and a $200,000 grant to help entrepreneurs.
There are these places called libraries.................................
People are already enhanced by AI. And they are human.
Considering the source, I'll take that as a compliment.
I am not.
Even the guy in the jungle knows, looks up at the universe out there and knows. Science today, looks at the universe within and knows. Its too much..dna etc
Precisely. Well said Paul Thomas.
Did I say that anytime someone is made to feel uncomfortable it's sexual harassment?