I think confusion was much earlier than that, the Jerusalem Councils are evidence that even within 20 years of the believed life of Jesus, his followers could not agree on who Jesus was, said or did.
Obviously you didn't read the research...
Not much difference IMO. Muslims too.
Nevertheless, Rome did fall, and it was not from insiders, it came from those who were allowed to cross it's borders, uncontrollably.
How nice that you know. Enlighten us about it.
Humans are constantly in a state of conflict. Conflict is what we do.
I think the reverse.
I mean I definitely seen you call people out on their grammar. LOL
I would go as far as saying Hitler was an irreleligious theist. He likely had a personal God, likely the same god as the Christian one, but he was not a practicing Christian
BAnd that cake is being denied because of the design of a cake. A wedding cake can be used for a wedding no matter any civil rights protected quality of the customers.
Dude looks like a lady.
Lincoln wanted to prevent Southern independence. Saying he wanted to free the slaves is post-hoc.
I see. You don't want to take responsibility to provide validity to your own claim. Just make shit up and force people to prove you wrong.
When is white pride month?
I don't mind the subject.
That covet thing comes with a list. It's pretty short, but it does name a wife as property, so you might not want to mention that one.
I don't want to censor anyone. Whether it's the KKK, Nazis, LGBT people or whoever; no matter how much I disagree with everything they're saying. Because the moment you make certain types of speech illegal, your voice is just a pawn of whoever is in power at the time. So it's great for you if that someone is someone who agrees with you, but if it's someone who disagrees with you, you're now more or less a slave of their ideology and have lost freedom of speech.
I forgot that lot! Nothing like fundamentalist religion to stir up hatred.
Not name-calling. Simply stating I know the law and there is no need to bring it up.
John is a very common name. It could be from John. Though not probably John the apostle who would have been very old. It's probably a different John. Or not.
Then we agree that those who claim to be born gay or who believe some are born gay are mistaken.
If you equate theory with Constitutional Law. The rest are stubborn remnants of compromise in a democracy.
-ahem- All of them? -ahem-