Newsflash: You do not understand what a code is. You do not
As I said circles, at the present time, there is no such test. The hypotheticals are just put there to make pro-lifers second guess their stance. God, if you believe in him, which I do but it seems many here don?t, does not make people gay. Nature is about procreation so even if you took God out of the equation, procreation is required to sustain a species. People use the word love in a very broad sense but carnal desires are not love...not the love Jesus speaks of in the Bible. Humans have freewill and everyone has predispositions. For some it is same sex attraction. In the Catholic view, to be attracted to the same sex is one thing, to act it out is another all together. We love people with these attractions regardless, however. Theological, Philosophical and Moral issues are involved here, issues that don?t seem to interest some of those here because they already know the answers. I have unfollowed because this site is a big waste of time. I just wanted to do you the courtesy of responding. God bless you.
Again... The Other Reasons people need a God is Not my Concern... That is a Private Matter but when it comes to Physics/ The Beginning and Evolution I find it hard for me to Accept them Placing "God" As a Reason for it....
ERMAGHERD!!!! I've decided I'm spending my Friday night drinking Tequila rose and watching baby goat videos
So, what you said about the Americans is that they are not statistically suicidal but quite dishonest in discussing what they really think. This form of mentality is called hypocrisy and conformism.
All you have proved is you don't like negative stories about Trump.
Based on his metaphysical reasoning.
Why? Because some theists will grasp at any possible straw and draw unfounded claims to make nonsense seem to make sense.
How many women has he dated and then they go crazy with blow? Lindsey, Demi, etc.
Disqus should automate that. Should we ask Disqus to make a button called "Invite uninterested grouchy people"?
So far, you're the closest I've seen to any of those things on this thread.
But we all know those eggs can find the sperms even if it?s in the abyss. *rolls eyes* ;))
didn't mean you just leaders that want followers.
LOL - that's awesome. I totally missed the opportunity for a Bolt-Pats joke. :)
Physician, heal thyself.
In Genesis, Adam is told, "the day you eat of it, you will surely die" of the prototypical sin. In the New Testament, Paul gives a vast list of sins which includes sins that certainly do not warrant the death penalty (like gossiping and boasting) and comments, "Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them." Romans 1:32
First off, Quran has nothing to do with the Bible. It did copy-paste a few bits from a (much more common in Arabian peninsula) Torah. Jesus is a passing reference in Quran, not more. Secondly - he was spreading his religion first, and his language - second. The very first translation of Quran that we know of was as early as 7th Century (into Persian) - and no Arabic ruler of the time objected to that effort.
Cherries & diet coke
Which premise of my argument have I violated?
Definitely the latter, but in some cases there are victims to the former, depending on how the employer treats that information. In some cases, the income earned gets attached to the victim's SS#, and thus the tax liability.
I explain. Read slowly.