Yes: it was a childish, terrible solution. That's why he promised to change his behaviour in that covenant (although he still wraps up the presentation in this really weird "And murder is wrong, so none of you do it or I'll have to kill you!" Yeah... because that's what you need to hear from your murderous all powerful deity as you leave the big boat of poop.)
Your wife is a selfish bitch. Give her the divorce, go live your life and be happy.
Easy- default to logic and reason. That which is true, can be shown to be true. If you cant show something is true then you don't know it is. That doesn't mean it isn't true- just simply not worthy of any confidence until sufficient evidence is given.
Libs would rather look the other way and pretend that all is well when indeed it is not.
Or as the article itself says:
Say hi to brother Ned for me M'kay?
Um, first off, this isn't a research - where is the data on which kind of criminals they worked with? Which kinds of criminals were repeat offenders?
Your posts make no sense.
While I "get it"?
In fact I pretty much have the same level of distaste for everyone. People suck universally.
That was the hard part? ;)
Truth may be personal opinion, but that doesn't mean there's many correct answers. There's only one.
Don?t know anyone who wouldn?t choose the baby
Yep you're out troll.
Speaking of "critical thinking",... "I know you are, but what am I", does not normally cut it.
So muslimm aeithiest, agnostic all favor the decline in Christianity, because they are driven by resentment disdain and hate, why no mention of the Jewish? Is the decline in Christianty because of the beheadings, beatings, burnings, break ins, and the threat of violent crimes against them ? (true Christian wouldn't allow those things to happen)
I asked, but TFCC has so far not given a single concrete example of how this relates to the Religion channel. The only claim is that it somehow establishes authenticity for "settlement sites", although I'm not sure how a 20 year correction in the time range changes anything.
No, they were terrible people by virtue of wealth and greed and excess. I dunno, if we all suffered affluenza, maybe. ??
The point is that you study them, don't preach them. Understand how and why the religion started, understand why people choose to follow them and why people don't. Understanding creates tolerance, and an educated approach to religion means less chance of being brain-washed. If someone then wants to follow one, I'd say more power to them.
Doesn?treally matter for this discussion. It?s about how YOU answer the question, does truth exist even if no one believes it.
P.S. Perhaps I don't really understand the definition of "strawman", or we have different definitions. What about my post is a strawman? How does it differ from the position of most Christian churches?
The "advocates" incessantly and obsessively refer to race, because they think it will work. They imagine it will intimidate people and silence them. But people have finally learned to see through that ploy and actually are fed up with it.
Soy boy Trudeau
"believing in [the] first place in imaginary things" - Yep, that's so "open minded."
No, the text is not all we have to go by. We also have the
"Congress has a duty to use the money it collects for common welfare - including, yes, helping out the industries it considers good for common welfare."
Umm, many are still worshipped. But as to why his nasme is know, the church tended to murder folks that did not convert.
They only keep us around because we entertain them and open the cat food cans for them
14 hours... What dosage? heh....
Yes, you absolutely are entering into a contract in all these instances, from an economics standpoint. It's not a written contract, but it's a contract. A verbal contract, an implied contract, a boilerplate contract like copyright - it's all contract.
Eurocide Law must all be rolled back across the Western World.
I think so.
Yes, I do tend to cling to facts and direct quotes.