I get where you're coming from. I try to be responsible too.
Nah. Fat shits like me that are vets and still young enough to serve would still take up the yoke.
Jeez. It's so complicated. There can be differences between subjective and objective truths. The differences can be trivial, modest or very important. The difference seems to be objective truths, to the extent they exist at all, can be verified or tested somehow. Subjective truths may or may not be verifiable or testable.
If he had lived though his presidency, I don't think JFK would be looked upon as fondly as he is by most.
6+6=12, the number of eggs in a dozen. 66 can be divided by 6, which gives us 11, which means nothing.
If the law allows those pharmacies to be licensed, why not? They can work there. If you are vegetarian you can't work in an ordinary restaurant and say "I won't cook or serve steaks": you go and work at a vegetarian restaurant.
Idk abt them real Catholics but here?s my experience when I was one of them.
If you claim there is a secular means by which joy and hope can be found in death then the burden of proof lies on your shoulders; not mine, since you are the one making a positive claim.
"Agreed. So, naturally the first settlers would build schools etc. They needed them. They were here. Religion has nothing to do with it."
I believe it is time we step up and stop "supposing" arguments and discus the actual one.
Must try, best of both worlds.
Trump is a fucking disaster. Hope America learns its lesson.
You obviously NO Jack about Toronto.
Thanks , will check it out.
It's a fallacy called 'denying the antecedent'. For example:
The Dept of State careerists believe they are more important and essential and correct than a mere POTUS. Way past time to jerk that Dept back into heel.
One thing that I've found interesting here is that people who participate in the fun posts are much more likely to be successful in engaging others on substantive political topics. And, more to the point, I find my responses to others have been enhanced by those interactions and even more to the "selfie" threads we run from time to time.
We never had to look for them in the first place.
One can believe something that can be known, but isn't known at the time of the belief. Also, sound beliefs require sound evidence.
Probably an illegal immigrant.
It is an argument against a CREATOR god.
Oh please. The only reason you oppose abortion is because you think the God you grovel to will punish the nation you live in for making abortions legal and even dumber you're afraid that when you meet Jesus he's going to tell you, "I never knew you. You didn't do enough to save those babies." So to protect yourself from this imaginary monster you're acting as if you care about the unborn when we all know you only care about your own selfish self. Your dirty little secret is out of the bag. Plus if your God did exist and could read minds he'd know you don't give a rip about the unborn. So it looks like your just SOL.
Science isn't about gods. It can't play hide and go seek all by itself.
Due to unbridled wishful thinking in the face of the stark reality that is soooo uncomfortable for them.