Umm - I most certainly did not directly insult or name-call anyone. I just gave an example of the 4 different permutations on a set of 2 variables. If you want to troll me then you are going to have to try harder than that disqus'ted. Thus far you have not proven yourself up for the challenge.
Nah, they just weren't well thought out. Geez, a small start up would have nailed this real quick.
Someone on a business trip having a consensual 1NS is miles away from the situation described in the Intro to this thread.
Ok we are now going to move a bit faster as more evidence for this is now available.
If the number of white twenty something guys hitting on me everytime i go to the gym is any indication, i must look delicious too. Who knew?
I changed my mind. Francisco is cool. You? Not anymore. ??
Throughout history, yes, most notable scientists have been Christian, so what?
You realise that at least in iteration 3 no court in the world would acquit you of murder charges?
No child should fear their parent. That they love them in spite of fear is not healthy mentally, and indeed many people end up hating their parents. If you think that has nothing to do with fear, then I pity your children.
Did I tell you to stop speaking your mind? I think you should start to speak your mind. It woukd be good to hear how you actually think, and it will help you work through your issues.
Least it wasn't ferrets. X_X
I've heard this called an 'Intellectual Turing Test'. The way I heard it expressed if you actually believe something you should be able to present the arguments against it well enough that an onlooker couldn't tell you apart from a genuine believer.
I love fiddleheads with garlic butter.
The more data pours in, the clearer we'll see.
The historical Jesus is bound to fall among the alert and conscientious, even if it means modifying or losing their received faith.
It is though. And you've been shown the evidence of this.
Was there compensation for the interview?
You don't hear much about that cherry-picked global warming "pause" any more.
Oh yeah? Any of it help prove any of the supernatural claims? No? Yeah ok, bye bye then
Atheism is not science and science is not atheism. I don't know where you got the idea that I was claiming that atheism was the foundation of science.
There's a catch in my question.
"admitting there IS no process in evolution to explain new splits and new complex structure"
Wow, that is a very specific compliant.
Awwkaay. I give. But I may come back to this someday again.
Trump and Ford are not subjects of criminal investigations. Hillary and Wynne were. The justice system is not finished with Hillary yet.
I am trying to make a short post. It is hard.