"And there is not a SINGLE validated and peer reviewed study which relates homicide and firearms."
Yes. That's one of the reasons it was so devastating for the Holocaust survivors to be tattooed. Tattooing is prohibited explicitly by the Torah (Leviticus 19:28) but like everything else in Judaism, it's more complicated than that... The reason I was considering one in the first place was because after studying the issue I realized there's no real reason you can't as long as you follow certain rules, but by that time I was in my late 30's and then I thought to myself do I really want to be in my 70's and be buried with it? In the end the answer was no. When I feel like it I get a henna tattoo.
because she was down with it-perfect hookup-two willing participants minus the gun
Ditto lol - maybe I can convince Mo lol.
That's why Islam apologists ardently defend it in every OP about Islam, obviously.
The problem is yours. Everyone that does not hate Jews you call a Jew. That only makes you feel good and does not bother us non-racists. I pity you.
Proof there is no god except maybe Loki or Coyote or Eris
"...your [sic] a racist...."
Chain migration has got exactly nothing to do w/the mainstreaming of [email protected]
I appreciate your perspective. Thanks.
Easily. Organized religion was conceived when the first con man met the first fool.
Do you admit you can't criticse a harmful ideology? What's wrong with you?
Doesn?t Israel have the right to their own messiah? It is Jewish concept
That might be the general statement of DISQUS, but even then each channel is individually owned and the channel owner has every right to set the rules in anyway they see fit. Some channels allow completely free expression, some will ban you if you do not agree with their very narrow opinion on a very narrow subject. That has nothing to do with our US right to free speech which is simply a right to criticize, petition and protest the Government without fear of being punished for doing so.
That's a fair assessment. I think it would have been better if she talked to him specifically instead of going to the authorities with it.
So then when someone tells you they believe God exists, why not just agree or disagree? What, then, is the point of debating any of this at all?
you comment on Love Stinks threads then complain about about being invited to new discussions
His ego is so carried away he actually believes his shite thinking anyone who doesn't know him will believe him.
As you know all this, you should have no problem proving it. Put up or shut up!
Can you name one European government that has been taken over by Islam?
I wanted a public option all along. I was never for the compromise. But it's cute that you are unable to refute facts and instead have to deflect to something very, very far from the topic. My guess is that you will not respond to this back on the topic, but will continue down your derailment about health care, because you know you lost the argument about how these tariffs will hurt the US economy in a big way.
Not any definition I have been presented with yet.
Can?t reveal the trick here. But the one I said is super easy.
Ever watch Big Bang Theory? It is done all the time - in the script.
State of euphoria?
You can get one of those through Amazon.
Almost every one of them meet the criteria under section 501 and use it.
Correct, and the establishment will try and bury the Horowitz investigation, too, by releasing the report on the eave of the nork summit. Only 3 congresscritters showed up to a joint committee session yesterday to question Preistep over the hitlery email shuck & jive.
What other gal lol? I'm lucky if there's even one gal in the picture, nevermind two.
I think we missed the boat when Chris lost out ,of any improvements for the common residents ....
Murder is a legal definition, abortion isn't included in the definition of murder.
I saw things were getting out of hand, so I intervened. I have no personal problems with anyone on these boards. Your beliefs are what you feel is truth, just like Karen, Ann, Tom, and Harry all have that freedom to choose.
Right and in this scenario, he KNEW she wouldn?t given his professional relationship with her boyfriend in which he is a superior. It is the very definition of #MeToo. Someone in a senior position using their power to exert their will over someone with less power... No, he wasn?t able to get her this time but change the surrounding circumstances ? she WAS a little drunk and he followed her ? who knows what could have happened.