I didn?t just say study.
Isn?t he currently in one of the ncis?s?
I prefer when they are black, like my heart.
That doesn't mean it's science "MISREPRESENTED". Its all a big 'if'. Right? The measurements taken of these skulls were no more different than Asians and Anglo etc today. But the biggest deal is, they were found so close together right? A few thousand years at most within the dig site. It was some watering hole.
That's true of islam. Iran is a good example of a deliberate revolution that was at first popular but that developed into oppression. (it was originally developed with Iranian communists, but Khomeini had them murdered).
The bitch knows she is on camera.
I don't hate the Christians. They just annoy me. Society can't move forward with that handicap.
lol ... i think so and i hope so ... but lol
Such as what exactly?
One day TFCC will write a coherent OP in his own words.(Right!).
A wasted post, as you know that I am no longer conversing with you.
I see no issue with two consenting adults having some fun.
Yes there is actually a lot of pretty clear and convincing evidence that God does not exist. Of course it's difficult to prove a negative. However there are a lot of things that should or should not be true if God does or does not exist. For example there is no clear evidence of the existence of any gods which is not surprising of no gods exist. Arguments for God?s existence suffer from irreparable logical flaws, which should not be the case if there really is a God. Religion demands faith and discourages attempts to verify its claims through testing and experimentation. This fact is less surprising if there is no God. Religion has a history of intolerance and violence, and this not likely to be true if there is a God. Science is a very effective way of gaining knowledge. Revelation and scriptural study are not, as people disagree about both and this fact is more likely to be true if there is no God. Religion attempts to suppress outside examination and criticism, and this fact is less surprising if there is no God. Religion has cruel, dangerous and repressive doctrines which it is morally incumbent upon us not to support. This should not be true if religion is true. There is a vast amount of religious confusion and disagreement between people who are members of the same religion. This fact is less surprising if there is no God. Religion is fragmented into sects that cannot agree on key issues of doctrine or ethics, and this should not be true of religion is true. Religions emerge in isolated areas and only then spread in space and time, rather than appearing in every society at once. If there is a God this should not be the case. The mind has a physical basis, and this fact is less like to be true if there is a God. There is too much gratuitous evil and unnecessary suffering. This should not be true if there is a God. Naturalism is the norm and supernaturalism cannot be verified which makes sense if there is no God. The Bible contains many contradictions and historical inaccuracies, and this fact is less surprising if there is no God. For the most part belief in God is a force for stagnation and against progress. This should not be true if there is a God. Atheists are no less happy or fortunate than believers and usually more so. This should not be the case if God exists.