His voice said no, but that uniform said yes!
Because it doesn't exist.
Internet commenting was a mistake.
"Why do some believers insist that God must have directly designed nature? Do they not see how hit-and-miss and improvised the natural world is?"
Yessss. I died laughing.
All these are nothing but theories and assumptions based on some genes and bones' resemblances. Pigs have almost the same identical genes like the humans, closer than the apes. Is there any specie found between the Gorilla, Orangutan, Chimpanzee and the human? And why we do not see any new specie to derive from them today?
Yes, I know. Your quarrel with him is because he didn't buy into your religious bullshit. He was too smart for that.
I am an atheist though I was agnostic for most of my life. I just get so tired of hearing how "unerring" the bible is when it has been changed and/or rewritten thousands of times. This OP is about morality/immorality and objectivity/subjectivity. But how can any Christians claim objective morality when they keep changing the target and then claim it hasn't changed. Sorry, that "situational ethics" which those same Christians completely detest and denounce, well, except when they are the ones doing it. I think they are, simply, lying.
Ma'am yes ma'am. And if it wasn't Harry, it'd have been someone else who was successful in their own right as well.... Not that beauty matters all that much in these instances, but she has all those other good qualities and is a looker at that...
If you are having special accommodation made to allow you to stay in the country you might want to follow the law. Just sain'.
Thank you for the response, Dynbrake. I am familiar with that view. In the research I'm (re) linking to, the author takes some time address that view and dispel it. Obviously, I would say we can't know the answer (his, yours, mine, whoever's), only put together clues.
You simply lack capacity to understand your god is nothing different from other imaginary beings. Believing in god ordering his horde of follower to kill entire nations, innocent children, stoning to death man gathering woods on Sabbath maybe just to prepare food for i.e. ill wife .... is however much, really much more dangerous and bloody that tooth fairy. That is only difference between god and other imaginary beings. For the rest no proofs ... sorry, no god.
cool, could I see it? I can give you my email or FB if you wanna keep it private XD
1% of 100 and 1% of 100,000 are still just 1%. Volume discounts do not apply.
They ALL follow different interpretations of their holy books.
You do what ever you want Coward. Post whatever you want wherever you want.
No. You clearly missed the 'purely'. Read again before getting on your high horse.
funny how these definitions keep changing to suit the fallacies
Yup, those half human cyborg mutant things ruining it for everyone... they probably don't enjoy eating cilantro either. :p
The Law was fulfilled at the cross. And it was for Jews, not Christians.
You're welcome, and thanks for your kind words.
Sins exist only if there is a God, as there is no God there is no sin.