It seems to me that you're missing the point. You keep claiming that people take things like gravity on faith when in reality they accept gravity because of verifiable evidence that we all have access to.
I don't think people mind that there are people in relationships where one person is more dominant. However when it comes to gender, the issue isn't of is it male or female, honestly no one really cares. It's the showboaters that put a social spot light on that couples lives that pisses people off. You find yourself in a situation where you feel you are required by social standards to judge these people who you would normally leave alone.
Tell them you're also not human RUDY BOT!
After that hourly quote, I was wondering when you'd find some teens! At that rate, and the hours needed= ?? no
I don't honestly believe a normal sane woman would view abortion as birth control. But there is a portion of the "pro" lobby that has framed the message in such a way that it gives the appearance that there is. Namely, "contraception" and "womens health" are frequently used as euphemisms for abortion services. Just be up front about it... In this regard, the pro lobby has actually done considerable damage to itself.
At this time it is Islamic - they are the ones blowing themselves and others up.
You're fired. :-) Go back to harassing Conservatives on
Wonderfully said, Ray.
I'm quite sure. Nothing in the passage quoted suggests it's right to beat one's slave. What it says is that if one beats one's slave and he dies, then punishment will ensue - a deterrent to a wise master from beating his slaves at all. This is set in the context of a general culture where a slave was the absolute property of his master, and homicide of a slave would go entirely unpunished - no legal code existing in the world at that time safeguarded a slave, except the Mosaic law.
The problem I believe with that line of thought is that these were world empires not religious empires. I believe that pagan apostate so-called Christendom is The Babylon the great found falling and being destroyed in rev. chpt.18. Since 1 john5:19 Sarah is in control off their world that includes its false religious, military, commercial, and governmental system. In rev 18, 19 these three entities ( commercial, military and governmental) are warching at afar as this false religious composite religiously whoring religious system is destroyed by the world govt.s that have been given the thought to carry out gods one thought to carry it out. The end result. The false religions of today are totally eliminated. Then comes the great tribulation, culminating with the destroying of the rest of Satan's world at Armageddon by Christ, his angels and the 144,000 anointed brideclass that join in to eliminate Satan and his demons and the entirety of his 6,000 years of crime against humanity.
I am really sorry ... but you are deluded if you think free education, better social welfare, free healthcare, better employment terms, and a more peaceful society is less 'free' ..
There have been, and are, cultures where marriage was more than a man and a woman. Polygamous marriages are common, even in the Bible (and sanctioned by "God," to boot). Even the Roman Catholic Church once presided over same-sex unions.
It gives them a better narrative to sell next season?
We went to Rocky Top in NC on Sundays as they couldn't sell alcohol in VA on Sunday. LOL I'd like to do a trip to KY. Want to go to Mammoth Caves!
lol Dan just agreed with the point you said it didn't apply.
I can understand that mindset given the nature of things
lol because most men have conflated egos about how attractive they are to warrant being checked out. i probably stare more at women. i'm like oh she is beautiful, i like ya hair, i like ya outfit, i like ya shoes, highlight poppin, where ya get those earrings girl. lmao.
Sorry but marriage is under definition and usage of the state and really always has. The state allows or deputizes people to perform the ritual of setting up a contract between two people. And then decides when that contract is no longer accepted. The individual may served or not serve the couple depending on tradition and established law. Churches as institutions may allow or not allow certain things or actions. So a church may admit or not certain persons provided they do not break the law. Businesses also may admit or reject upon certain visible characteristics based upon good order as defined by society. So they may require a certain dress code, but if they allow them in, then once in they must not refuse equal service. And the reason for non-admittance must be correctable or changeable. Can?t change skin color or sexual orientation. But you can refrain from certain activities. A religious institution can seat men seperately from women but if they allow mixing they cannot refuse a gay couple from sitting together provided they maintain decorum.