If you are working 80 hour weeks, she may have a point. I'll grant that. If not....
I'm not old nor a dumbass but nice try sweet heart
"True, we don't use it on fossils, but some want to. It should be ok to
Lightfoot, you're in a good place in life at this moment. I believe you are sincere in saying you "need some measurable, non-ambiguous proof." And if you are, take 5 minutes and ask Jesus Himself to show you the proof you need. He is doing it daily for the Muslims, by coming to them Himself and proving who He is. He'll do the same for you too.
Your perspective is warped though. You actually equated Durham, NC's, fat conniving jheri-curled Rev. Barber to Martin Luther King.
No. No matter what you want, the other guy never, ever has to endorse your choices, especially when it comes to religion or politics. Any more than a Democrat baker can be forced to bake a "Trump 2020" cake for some GOP rally, or an atheist baker can be forced to provide cupcakes for Billy Graham's funeral visitation (with little "John 3:16's" in red icing on the tops). This is what it means to have a 1st Amendment -- you don't get to force people to approve of your lifestyle.
So, what is your null hypothesis?
He is who he claimed. Not everyone has faith.
I highly recommend the youtube channel 'Precious Stars Pads'. She's really knowledgeable and open about this stuff - I picked out my menstrual cup based on her review/comparison video of like a dozen different cups. She talks about cloth pads and those 'Thinx' underwear or whatever as well - and there's tons of videos on like, how to clean/maintain/use the products :)
Mmm what could it be?
I don't know whether to thank you or to curse you. LOL!! I might need to purchase some pants with elastic waistbands lol
"Continuing ongoing harassment" is what happens when several people are all approaching a woman during the course of a week, month, year, and thinking it is okay to ask her for sex. The *one guy* thinks it's just him. It isn't.
That is a matter of interpretation. They will simply say that violence was only meant to be used as a reaction in times that Muslims were oppressed.
If I'm understanding you correctly, it sounds like what you're saying is not that different from what Schweitzer was saying - namely, that Jesus is a Rorschach blot, and even scholars inevitably interpret him to be whatever they want him to be. That's focusing on only half of Schweitzer's message, though. His point was that there is a core of facts we can know about Jesus to which each possible historical reconstruction of him must be accountable. Those facts don't free us from reconstruction; after all, they're just a skeleton. But they do control and constrain our possible reconstructions.
Of your idiot president?
When all the drama was happening they weren't taking people inside. So the people that would of made the cutoff got a number too
In other words, you don't know.
Nope - merely how he was treated by some progs. I did not see that much on this channel. This channel is mostly filled with the right-wing type of sycophantry.
The queen is at the end. I think she may know she wronged her son...maybe! And supposedly, she liked Fergie, the wild wife of Andrew, so she probably came around to women being allowed to be actual human beings, and not formal 'Consorts' to her legacy.
You saying "lick"
nature does not for t he most part subscribe to homosexuality, in some cases its a display of dominance in others its survival. If it did it on a macro scale it would be the end of its species.
Still eagerly awaiting a denier to post the citations to the peer-reviewed scientific research published in scientific refereed journals that falsified AGW.
Yes, I LITERALLY am. Did I mention literally? Yes, I did, should I do that again? I don?t care, as the other two choices represent economic Armageddon.
Go ahead and prove that there was any "Intelligence" to create as per Bible. Prove - as in, with science and reason. Not "the Bible tells so".
That's what God wanted. He's God. Go argue with Him.