Nelmaran 27.02.2018
The Warriors aren't a dynasty because samcro said, got it?
Shakazshura 08.03.2018
Correct, voting is not against the laws, however just because something is voted on doesn't a) make it a good law and b) certainly doesn't make the law legal. This is why many laws which are passed in states get overturned because they end up violating the constitution or the rights of other individuals.
Malatilar 08.03.2018
If you don't snatch that rug from under everything and get to stepping...??
Goltijas 13.03.2018
actually, I too would like to learn more about this whole conversion after death, thing
Mijar 19.03.2018
Which is why you never see a Catholic priest or a nun in street clothes with no outward identification. Which explains why celibacy was not required of priests until the fourth century when the church, having gotten too bit for its britches, needed to feel, as you put it, special, chosen and blessed.
Dinris 28.03.2018
May we call Mozart's "Requiem" or various works by Michaelangelo etc, "skid marks"? You talk about hate but your comment is dripping with it. I don't think the God concept is to blame for that. You have allowed yourself to cultivate hate within yourself in the form of blaming something or somebody else. It's a story as old as man.
Nikozragore 04.04.2018
Sorry Matt, but I want a diamond, lol. Or a semi-precious stone of some kind.
Douktilar 10.04.2018
"When they write into law a word like "islamophobia" you don't consider that pandering?"
Voshura 10.04.2018
"Religion has no right to impose it's agenda on me; an individual. That's literally what you just said."
Mukasa 14.04.2018
I didn?t say you were atheist. I was commenting on Sagan?s quote
Douktilar 20.04.2018
So you answered your own question and essentially admitted that humans are special. Great. I knew you could do it.
Kigagis 23.04.2018
That's funny - I thought God is omni-present?
Mozshura 23.04.2018
LOL exactly! Meanwhile I end up wearing the same boyfriend rolled up jeans and a rotation of tank tops the entire time.
Nesida 01.05.2018
i'm saying that because ministers receive the tax break, it is self evident that the tax law benefits ministers. however, i'm not saying it is self evident that the law is unconstitutional. that's what's up for debate.
(mh=zId5sKKestbPDGMc)15.jpg)
(mh=WGh3ysBVOqKbFn64)11.jpg)
(mh=iNM3rvHl3l9KM9ox)4.jpg)
(mh=2c5b4yeKtT-vSUsQ)15.jpg)
(mh=CwDBt1aQWdMuUwwT)13.jpg)
(mh=XEUpU9oY3op-llBb)12.jpg)
(mh=JAGi_DY0ZOA9ZueB)9.jpg)
(mh=p1TK1FQUOhki0Wnj)0.jpg)
(mh=JmXx4jl7KFZsBDhu)3.jpg)
(mh=2HG6u7_fon3Cl5XJ)16.jpg)
(mh=_LAOyecfujGh7WZU)4.jpg)
(mh=Kaqad3c85218vMIN)5.jpg)
(mh=x8H1GGDHyHXHT958)4.jpg)
(mh=CykihXvgt3il-iJF)6.jpg)