This kind of release time is not uncommon.
History has show us that he would have done better. Of course, you being a gullible right-winger who never looks at history, it's fully understandable that you wouldn't know this history...
The only thing that allowing you to compare the two is a disconnect on your part.
I wish. ??
I hope you're right. I think many Liberal voters of the past will bail on the Liberals and vote NDP this time. Resulting in a PC or NDP minority
At least - - - You're HEARING it clear and loud. No excuses like: "I didn't know."
..and yet here you are, participating yet again in one of my threads. Welcome...
I actually like the word supernatural. I clearly defined that which is invented. I also like it because it help to distinguish the areas which separate various religions and the non religious. Just about everyone is a humanist with a variety of supernatural beliefs. Distinguishing supernaturalist from the rest reveals commonalities amongst people. Good word. If a fool invented it, they did a good job just that one time.
Seems more likely we sprang forth to be used by bacteria.
I don't know if it is possible
How can you impeach someone for withdrawing from a completely non-binding deal that the other side didn't even have to sign? Exactly what laws were broken?
Lets compare the gods and the actions of its followers.
You're still here
No I am not arguing that God is necessary in science. I am saying we don't know and science has not shown us one way or the other. You have no evidence that God is necessary for science to function one way or the other.
and people driving a hundred miles and having no idea why they're eatting pancakes at a roadside diner in their pajamas...
But we have some idea of what the word Infinite means, and we know it doesn't mean finite. That which is bounded is finite.