It makes all the difference.
Bernard: "I'd have a barf bag close by."
Should we be shunning Russia? The ?80s called...
I supply evidence supporting the other comment and your response is "oh stop will ya". My apologies for bursting your intellectually ignorant bubble.
The meaning of feminism has been perverted by angry people who want to undermine women's issues. I think the same of people who undermine legitimate claims of harrasment based on cases like this one.
You are so filled with anger you are frightening. Seriously, go get checked before we have another Hodgkinson on our hands.
it's so awkward when their balls are just resting on the bridge of your nose.
Sadly Diana did not have it all. She had an unhappy childhood plus she was pretty disturbed even before her marriage. It wasn't a love match. She hardly knew Charles before they married. Also, he was very much in love with someone else from the outset. It was - pretty much from the start - all surface.
And some are brainwashed to think it is already fully human as a one cell big zygote. They are the ones who not want to think about it.
You don't have a shred of a case, do you!
Your daughter must be around 14 or so, then. Mine saved it for 19-21, and it was hell.
I have contempt for the primitive nonsense of religion, not those afflicted with it. They may well be coerced into believing it. Hate the sin, not the sinner, as the godbothering ninnies would say.
For attempted murder?
"You are very much saying that everything that has already happened has or had (doesn't make sense either way) a 100% of occurring."
Like what? How would you change it?
Oh, those name are too far out for you but "fluffy" is acceptable?
Harmless foul. You are human, not a machine. And definitely would be stupid to fire you to appease some lowlife idiot.
So at the very worst natural selection may not be the the mechanism by which changes occur. You seem to think that disproves the entirety of the Theory. Doubt is not what negates a Theory. It must be DISPROVEN. Every aspect must be disproven for it to be "wrong". I have not seen you present anything that would rise to that level. The best you have is that they may be rethinking certain portions of the details of various aspects. That is science. As new information is gathered it winds up explaining the methods behind the scenes in greater detail.
if making Un an equal at the table stops Un nuke ambitions and stops his missile testing and stabilizes the region... then id say... good for Trump fro making Un an equal....
Covenant 132, which described "plural marriage" as an "everlasting covenant" lasted until 1891, when it was disavowed because it was an impediment to statehood for Utah, but was still practiced for years after officially disavowing it. It was never completely abandoned.
A great deal is interpretation or extrapolation from repeatable experiments to draw conclusions that are impossible to repeat...the repeatable portion of the Theory of Evolution in minuscule, for example.
True selflessness is self destructive.